Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of group than to be the leader of a group.
Being
a leader or a member, both of them has to be responsible about rule, fervent
to do goals in a group, affectionate each other, alert to help each
other . Yet, being a leader is more challenging. I disagree if It is better to
be a member of group than to be the leader of a group.
Alright
I am going to punctuate to support my argument.
Being
a leader has A great many advantage .
1)
Have opportunity.
Being
a leader can have opportunity to have high social mobility. It is kinda open
the door .
For
example : you are being a leader in small project, due to your ability. You are
gregarious person, able to find solutions about elusive things in project,
determined person . So that's why you get opportunity to manage big project .
2)
Get plenty networking .
For
example : you are being a leader in small business, and then people know
that you are a leader in that group, people ask you to join and share
experience each other .
3)
Sharpen your communication skill
For
example : if there's difficult something to solve and many people in that group
are quarrelsome but because you are broad-minded , & assertive person,
hence you can manage them by having good communication .
4)
Manage emotions
Being
a leader , you can try to learn how to have mindfulness .
For
example : if you have a problem in a group you have to control your
emotion and try to have mindfulness hence everything is going well.
Because
of being a leader has ample benefits hence, i disagree about the
statement above . Everyone has to have a chance to be a leader hence they
can develop themselves.
Comments
Post a Comment